Leading performance on any given day will yield superior results to driving performance.
Driving performance requires a will to win and highly developed sense urgency. Doesn't sound too bad does it? And in the short term it's not bad. The problem is that you can only drive people, i.e. human beings, for so long, without burning them and the organization out.
Tools for driving performance include hard handed performance management, a big stick and a commanding presence. Driving performance succeeds best in an environment where there is fear. Driving performance turns team members against themselves in what we used to call, creative conflict.
Leading performance, on the other hand, requires a commitment to the long term, a lack of fear of the short term and a strategic vision. It requires and grows best in an environment of trust where recognition is used more forcefully than retribution; where the carrot is the tool of choice over harsh criticism. Leading performance develops and builds teams.
Leading performance however is not for the faint of heart. It requires a commitment of time, an open embrace of change and the willingness to invest in your most important resources, people.
There is no shortage of books, articles and voices that can tell you more about what you need to know to lead performance rather than drive it.
Some of my favorites include:
· The Carrot Principle: How Great Managers Use Employee Recognition by Adam Gostick and Chester Elton
· The SPEED of Trust: The One Thing That Changes Everything by Stephen M.R. Covey, Stephen R. Covey, and Rebecca R. Merrill
· Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap... and Others Don't by Jim Collins
· The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable by Patrick Lencioni
